ChatGPT, Zapier, and RPA tools are great for simple tasks. But if you're trying to solve a real business problem — fraud, documentation, forecasting, compliance — generic tools consistently underperform. Here's the data.
3–5x
Better ROI vs. generic tools
6–18 wks
Typical build timeline
$100K–$3M
Annual savings per deployment
100%
Data stays on your infrastructure
How custom AI stacks up against the most common alternatives
Custom AI
ConsultingWhiz
ChatGPT / Copilot
Generic LLM
Zapier / Make
No-code automation
RPA
UiPath / Automation Anywhere
Learns your processes, terminology, and patterns
Generic training — doesn't know your business
No AI training — rule-based automation only
Scripted rules, not adaptive intelligence
Deep integration with ERP, CRM, EHR, custom APIs
Limited via plugins; no enterprise system access
Surface-level integrations; no complex logic
UI-scraping integrations; brittle to UI changes
Trained on your actual exceptions and edge cases
Fails on domain-specific edge cases
Breaks when workflow deviates from happy path
Requires manual rule updates for every exception
Runs on your infrastructure; data never leaves
Your data sent to OpenAI's servers
Data passes through Zapier's cloud
Runs locally; data stays on-premise
Continuously learns from new outcomes and feedback
Static model; no learning from your usage
Rules don't self-improve
Requires manual updates to improve
PDFs, images, audio, video, free-text — all handled
Text and images only; no structured output
Structured data only
Structured, predictable data only
Fixed infrastructure cost regardless of usage volume
Per-token pricing scales linearly with usage
Per-task pricing; expensive at scale
Per-bot licensing; expensive to scale
Your AI is unique — competitors can't replicate it
Every competitor has access to the same tool
Commodity automation; no differentiation
Commodity technology; easily replicated
● = Full capability ◐ = Partial capability ✗ = Not supported
What actually happens when businesses try to solve these problems with generic tools vs. custom AI
Misses 23% of risk clauses; no knowledge of your standard positions; data sent to OpenAI
96.2% accuracy; trained on your playbook; runs on your servers; flags deviations from your specific standards
Handles only FAQ-level questions; escalates 65% of tickets; no knowledge of your products or policies
Resolves 68% of tickets without escalation; knows your entire product catalog, policies, and customer history
Catches 31% of fraud; 72% false positive rate; fraudsters learn to route around static rules
Catches 94% of fraud; 18% false positive rate; continuously adapts to new fraud patterns
Works only on standardized forms; fails on handwriting, unusual layouts, or new document types
Handles any document format; extracts your specific fields; 99.1% accuracy on your document types
Historical averages only; doesn't account for promotions, weather, local events, or supply constraints
Incorporates 200+ signals; 35% reduction in overstock; 28% reduction in stockouts
We'll always tell you honestly if generic tools are a better fit for your situation.
If your support questions are repetitive and well-documented, a generic chatbot with your FAQ content works fine.
If you need to move data between two SaaS tools on a schedule, Zapier is faster and cheaper than custom AI.
For marketing copy, social posts, and internal drafts, ChatGPT or Copilot is perfectly adequate.
Not sure which approach is right for your use case? Take our free AI audit →
Get a free AI audit in 2 minutes. We'll identify your top 3 opportunities, project the ROI, and tell you honestly whether custom AI is the right fit.